Editorial Policy

This page sets out how we produce what you read here. We publish it because on a money topic, you cannot evaluate a review without knowing the standards behind it.

How we classify claims

Every factual claim on this site falls into one of three categories, and we label which:

Verified — confirmed against a primary source: a regulator’s own records, an operator’s own published terms, or official guidance. We cite it.
Operator-claimed — stated by the operator or its marketing, not independently confirmed. We attribute it and do not present it as fact.
Unverifiable — circulating without a traceable source. We either exclude it or name it as unverifiable.

Most statistics circulating about gambling apps in this market fall into the third category. We do not repeat them to fill space.

What we will not publish

These are hard rules, not preferences:

Licence claims we cannot verify. We will not write “licensed and regulated by PAGCOR” because an operator says so or because other sites repeat it. A licence has a number and appears in a public register, or it is not evidenced.
Invented numbers. No user counts, transaction volumes, payout times, download totals or satisfaction percentages without a source.
Fake reviews or testimonials. We do not write player feedback in invented voices, and we do not attach percentages to surveys we did not conduct.
Content that imitates an operator. No login pages, no registration forms, no payment flows, no page designed to be mistaken for an official channel.
App files or download mirrors. We do not host or link APKs. We will not instruct readers to disable Android security protections.
Risk-free framing. We will not describe gambling as a way to earn money, and we will not omit the house edge.
Guaranteed systems or strategies. They do not exist for negative-expectation games.

Review methodology

When we assess an operator we work through, in order: regulatory status and whether a licence is verifiable; published terms for withdrawals, bonuses and limits; what KYC is required and when; what payment methods and fees apply; what recourse a player has in a dispute; and what responsible-gambling tools are available.

We weight these unequally. Regulatory status dominates. Game catalogue, interface quality and bonus size are close to irrelevant next to whether anyone can compel the operator to pay you.

Corrections

We correct errors rather than quietly deleting them. If we have something wrong — including if you can show us a licence record we failed to find — tell us. Substantive corrections are noted on the page.

Every page carries a “last reviewed” date. We update pages when the regulatory position changes or when new verifiable information emerges. We do not update them to make an operator look better.

Commercial independence

We may earn affiliate commission — see our affiliate disclosure. No commercial relationship changes any of the rules above. An operator cannot buy a verification we could not perform.

What we are not

We are not lawyers, financial advisers, or addiction professionals, and nothing here is legal, financial or medical advice. We are not a regulator and we cannot adjudicate a dispute. For gambling harm, please contact the National Problem Gambling Helpline.

Who we are: about this site and who writes it. The legal framework for using the site: terms of use and privacy policy.

Last updated: 2 November 2026.